Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCI scored 68.0, WY scored 68.0 — tied at the top.
Compare another set
CCI
Crown Castle Inc.
REIT - Specialty · Financial strength
92.3Fin
$79.56 · $34.8B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
20.1
CCI leads
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
REIT - Specialty · Financial strength
72.2Fin
$18.97 · $13.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthWY-3.1%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCI
WY
5.3%A-
Yield
4.4%B+
-4.4%D+
Rev
-3.1%D+
Negative equity
D/E
0.58A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
CCICrown Castle Inc.
REIT - Specialty · $79.56 · beta 0.96
Why now
REIT - Specialty · market cap $34.8b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $100.50 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.63 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $94.45 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Dividend payout 173% of earnings on a 5.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
WYWeyerhaeuser Company
REIT - Specialty · $18.97 · beta 0.93
Why now
REIT - Specialty · market cap $13.7b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $27.75 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $28.82 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 129% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is CCI or WY the better stock?
On the Bull Rankings quality-growth score they are level: CCI and WY both score 68.0 out of 100. The score blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number, so a tie means the model sees no meaningful edge either way — the pillar breakdown on this page shows where each is actually stronger.
How are CCI and WY scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.