COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCEP vs COCO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCEP scored 38.7, COCO scored 65.3 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. COCO's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CCEP's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
38.7
$108.00 · $47.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.6
COCO leads
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
65.3
$63.35 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCEP20.8x
- Fastest growthCOCO+26.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCOCO0.04
- Highest qualityCOCO85 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCEP
stronger →← stronger
COCO
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
85
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
93
19
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
COCO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCEP
COCO
—
FCF
$124mC
+2.3%C
Rev
+26.1%A-
1.39C+
D/E
0.04A
20.8xB
P/E
35.0xC
3.11D
PEG
2.36C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCEP
COCO
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-32%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-20%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+1%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCEP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $47.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $113.67. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $113.65 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCEP and COCO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.6 points in favor of COCO. The widest single difference is Growth, where COCO leads by 43.5 points.
- GrowthCCEP 49.5 · COCO 93.0COCO +43.5
- ValueCCEP 19.0 · COCO 35.4COCO +16.4
- QualityCCEP 72.0 · COCO 84.7COCO +12.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.