COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
CASY vs MNSO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CASY scored 36.4, MNSO scored 69.9 — MNSO leads.
Compare another set
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
36.4
$763.38 · $28.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
33.5
MNSO leads
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
69.9
$11.26 · $3.4B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMNSO11.1x
- Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCASY0.74
- Highest qualityMNSO90 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CASY
stronger →← stronger
MNSO
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
80
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
9
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
MNSO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CASY
MNSO
$722mC+
FCF
—
+10.2%B
Rev
+26.2%A-
0.74B+
D/E
1.04B
39.9xC
P/E
11.1xA-
3.63D
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CASY
MNSO
56% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~18%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-36%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-25%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CASY
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
MNSO
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $28.2b. 18% off the 52-week high of $927.85. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $957.39 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 101% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 40x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 4.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.4b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $25.92 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.10 (implying +70% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CASY and MNSO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 33.5 points in favor of MNSO. The widest single difference is Value, where MNSO leads by 62.9 points.
- ValueCASY 9.2 · MNSO 72.1MNSO +62.9
- QualityCASY 65.4 · MNSO 89.9MNSO +24.5
- GrowthCASY 80.2 · MNSO 95.7MNSO +15.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.