COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
CART vs SE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CART scored 67.4, SE scored 73.7 — SE leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CART's fundamentals are as of March 2026, but SE's are as of December 2025 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CART
Maplebear Inc.
67.4
$45.84 · $10.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.3
SE leads
SE
Sea Limited
73.7
$111.76 · $68.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CART
stronger →← stronger
SE
93
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
39
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
SE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CART
SE
$882mC+
FCF
$4.5bB
+11.8%B
Rev
+33.2%A
0.01A
D/E
0.28A-
25.0xC+
P/E
43.8xC
2.45C
PEG
1.53C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CART
SE
50% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
9% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
+66%
1-yr DCF upside
-16%
+99%
5-yr DCF upside
+10%
+161%
10-yr DCF upside
+59%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CART
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Short track record
SE
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
CARTMaplebear Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $10.8b. 14% off the 52-week high of $53.50. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.44 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 182% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
SESea Limited
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $68.1b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $199.30 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +33% — in hypergrowth territory. 28 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $142.26 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. $68.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.51 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.