COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ABG vs CARG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ABG scored 69.7, CARG scored 83.4 — CARG leads.
Compare another set
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
69.7
$215.37 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.7
CARG leads
CARG
CarGurus, Inc. Class A Common Stock
83.4
$36.89 · $3.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestABG8.0x
- Fastest growthCARG+13.9%
- Strongest balance sheetCARG0.70
- Highest qualityCARG88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueABG-76%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ABG
stronger →← stronger
CARG
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
58
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
85
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
CARG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ABG
CARG
$669mC+
FCF
$315mC
+4.1%C+
Rev
+13.9%B+
1.41C+
D/E
0.70B+
8.0xA
P/E
19.0xB
0.60A-
PEG
1.08B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ABG
CARG
76% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
38% below
~-23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+262%
1-yr DCF upside
+39%
+322%
5-yr DCF upside
+62%
+429%
10-yr DCF upside
+100%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ABG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
CARG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
ABGAsbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $263.38. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $254.20 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CARGCarGurus, Inc. Class A Common Stock
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.3b. 11% off the 52-week high of $41.22. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.50 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 67% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 179% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
CARG leads ABG by 13.7 points (83.4 to 69.7), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer ABG, which trades about 76% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — ABG screens as value, CARG screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ABG and CARG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.7 points in favor of CARG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthABG 57.9 · CARG 85.1CARG +27.2
- QualityABG 69.1 · CARG 88.1CARG +19.0
- ValueABG 84.5 · CARG 77.2ABG +7.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.