COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
CAR vs PRG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CAR scored 39.4, PRG scored 57.9 — PRG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PRG's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CAR's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
39.4
$139.49 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.5
PRG leads
PRG
PROG Holdings, Inc.
57.9
$39.65 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCAR+0.7%
- Highest qualityPRG65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePRG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CAR
stronger →← stronger
PRG
43
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
20
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
45
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
PRG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CAR
PRG
-$11.4bF
FCF
$319mC
+0.7%C
Rev
+0.4%C
—
D/E
1.10C+
0.4xA
P/S
—
0.17A
PEG
0.93B+
—
P/E
12.8xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CAR
PRG
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+103%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+132%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+178%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CAR
PRG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CARAvis Budget Group, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $4.9b. Down 84% from 52-week high of $847.70 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $129.14 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$11.4b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -5.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 84% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
PRGPROG Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Rental & Leasing Services · market cap $1.6b. 17% off the 52-week high of $47.73. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $53.43 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.79 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CAR and PRG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.5 points in favor of PRG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCAR 20.2 · PRG 45.0PRG +24.8
- QualityCAR 42.9 · PRG 65.0PRG +22.1
- ValueCAR 70.6 · PRG 66.4CAR +4.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.