COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CALM vs JBS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CALM scored 36.2, JBS scored 71.3 — JBS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CALM's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but JBS's are as of December 2025 — a 5-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
36.2
$84.60 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
35.1
JBS leads
JBS
JBS N.V.
71.3
$13.88 · $14.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCALM12.8x
- Fastest growthJBS+11.7%
- Highest qualityCALM71 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCALM-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CALM
stronger →← stronger
JBS
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
13
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
JBS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CALM
JBS
$329mC
FCF
$833mC+
-31.7%F
Rev
+11.7%B
—
D/E
2.83D
12.8xA-
P/E
13.0xA-
2.20C
PEG
0.45A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CALM
JBS
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
24% below
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
+48%
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
+95%
5-yr DCF upside
+32%
+192%
10-yr DCF upside
+97%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CALM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
JBS
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CALMCal-Maine Foods, Inc.
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $4.0b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $116.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.00 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Dividend payout 72% of earnings on a 5.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
JBSJBS N.V.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $14.9b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $18.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.45 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.14 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
ROE 23% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.83 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Dividend payout 93% of earnings on a 9.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 2.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CALM and JBS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 35.1 points in favor of JBS. The widest single difference is Growth, where JBS leads by 56.3 points.
- GrowthCALM 12.7 · JBS 69.0JBS +56.3
- ValueCALM 52.9 · JBS 75.8JBS +22.9
- QualityCALM 70.9 · JBS 69.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.