COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CALM vs COCO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CALM scored 36.2, COCO scored 66.4 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
36.2
$84.60 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
30.2
COCO leads
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
66.4
$63.36 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCALM12.8x
- Fastest growthCOCO+26.1%
- Highest qualityCOCO85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCALM-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CALM
stronger →← stronger
COCO
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
85
13
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
93
53
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
COCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CALM
COCO
$329mC
FCF
$124mC
-31.7%F
Rev
+26.1%A-
—
D/E
0.04A
12.8xA-
P/E
35.0xC
2.20C
PEG
2.29C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CALM
COCO
49% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% above
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
+48%
1-yr DCF upside
-32%
+95%
5-yr DCF upside
-20%
+192%
10-yr DCF upside
+1%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CALM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
CALMCal-Maine Foods, Inc.
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $4.0b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $116.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.00 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Dividend payout 72% of earnings on a 5.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CALM and COCO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 30.2 points in favor of COCO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCALM 12.7 · COCO 93.0COCO +80.3
- ValueCALM 52.9 · COCO 37.2CALM +15.7
- QualityCALM 70.9 · COCO 84.7COCO +13.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.