COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026

BRBR vs CALM

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRBR scored 72.0, CALM scored 36.2 — BRBR leads.
Compare another set
BRBR
BellRing Brands, Inc.
Packaged Foods · Quality-Growth
72
$10.19 · $1.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
35.8
BRBR leads
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
Farm Products · Quality-Growth
36.2
$84.60 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestBRBR7.2x
  • Fastest growthBRBR+16.1%
  • Highest qualityCALM71 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueBRBR-86%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.1GROWTH62.1VALUE98.4
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD36.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY70.9GROWTH12.7VALUE52.9
BRBRCALMQuality62.170.9Growth62.112.7Value98.452.9
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)6%26%+2.2x12x+BRBRoff-scaleCALM

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFBRBR$225mCALM$329m
RevBRBR+16.1%CALM-31.7%
P/EBRBR7.2xCALM12.8x
PEGBRBR0.28CALM2.20
BRBR
stronger →← stronger
CALM
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
62
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
13
98
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
BRBR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
BRBR
CALM
$225mC
FCF
$329mC
+16.1%B+
Rev
-31.7%F
7.2xA
P/E
12.8xA-
0.28A
PEG
2.20C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BRBR
CALM
86% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+446%
1-yr DCF upside
+48%
+626%
5-yr DCF upside
+95%
+1023%
10-yr DCF upside
+192%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BRBR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Short track record
CALM
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cut its dividend
BRBRBellRing Brands, Inc.
Packaged Foods · $10.19 · beta 0.52
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $1.2b. Down 76% from 52-week high of $43.02 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.28 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $14.71 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 76% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -37% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CALMCal-Maine Foods, Inc.
Farm Products · $84.60 · beta 0.23
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $4.0b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $116.99 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $88.00 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Dividend payout 72% of earnings on a 5.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where BRBR and CALM diverge

On the headline score the gap is 35.8 points in favor of BRBR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.