COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

CAH vs COR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CAH scored 66.2, COR scored 62.1 — CAH leads.
Compare another set
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
Medical Distribution · Quality-Growth
66.2
$237.57 · $55.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.1
CAH leads
COR
Cencora, Inc.
Medical Distribution · Quality-Growth
62.1
$323.85 · $61.8B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestCOR24.0x
  • Fastest growthCAH+14.2%
  • Highest qualityCOR69 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueCAH-58%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD66.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY68.5GROWTH79.2VALUE53.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD62.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY68.7GROWTH72.8VALUE47.8
CAHCORQuality68.568.7Growth79.272.8Value53.647.8
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-1%24%19x38xCAHCOR

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFCAH$4.5bCOR$4.1b
RevCAH+14.2%COR+9.3%
P/ECAH32.9xCOR24.0x
PEGCAH1.20COR0.67
CAH
stronger →← stronger
COR
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
79
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
54
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
CAH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CAH
COR
$4.5bB
FCF
$4.1bB
+14.2%B+
Rev
+9.3%B
Negative equity
D/E
4.47D
32.9xC+
P/E
24.0xB+
1.20B+
PEG
0.67A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CAH
COR
58% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~-12%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+116%
1-yr DCF upside
+55%
+141%
5-yr DCF upside
+70%
+184%
10-yr DCF upside
+95%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CAH
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
COR
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
CAHCardinal Health, Inc.
Medical Distribution · $237.57 · beta 0.50
Why now
Medical Distribution · market cap $55.0b. 8% off the 52-week high of $258.30. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $270.33 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of cash released from working capital ($1.7b) — a release that doesn't repeat every year the way earnings can. $55.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 0.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CORCencora, Inc.
Medical Distribution · $323.85 · beta 0.58
Why now
Medical Distribution · market cap $61.8b. 14% off the 52-week high of $377.54. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $369.92 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 97% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 155% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash. $61.8b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 4.47 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 0.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CAH leads COR by 3.4 points (69.6 to 66.2), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer COR, which trades about 44% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — CAH screens as growth, COR screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CAH and COR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 4.1 points in favor of CAH. The widest single difference is Growth, where CAH leads by 6.4 points.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is CAH or COR the better stock?

CAH scores higher: CAH 66.2, COR 62.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do CAH and COR differ most?

The widest gap is growth, where CAH leads by 6 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. CAH also leads value, while quality is effectively level between them.

How are CAH and COR scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.