COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CAAP vs TXT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CAAP scored 68.6, TXT scored 70.4 — TXT leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. TXT's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but CAAP's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CAAP
Corporación América Airports S.A.
68.6
$23.46 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
TXT leads
TXT
Textron Inc.
70.4
$82.95 · $14.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCAAP13.3x
- Fastest growthTXT+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetTXT0.52
- Highest qualityCAAP71 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCAAP-70%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CAAP
stronger →← stronger
TXT
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
91
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
CAAP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CAAP
TXT
$468mC
FCF
$759mC+
+6.4%C+
Rev
+8.8%B
0.56B
D/E
0.52B
13.3xA-
P/E
15.6xA-
0.71A-
PEG
1.16B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CAAP
TXT
70% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+170%
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
+230%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
+347%
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CAAP
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
TXT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
CAAPCorporación América Airports S.A.
Why now
Airports & Air Services · market cap $3.8b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $30.50 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $32.29 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
TXTTextron Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $14.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $101.57. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.89 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
TXT leads CAAP by 1.9 points (70.4 to 68.5), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer CAAP, which trades about 70% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — CAAP screens as value, TXT screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CAAP and TXT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.8 points in favor of TXT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCAAP 50.0 · TXT 75.1TXT +25.1
- ValueCAAP 91.4 · TXT 72.1CAAP +19.3
- QualityCAAP 70.5 · TXT 64.5CAAP +6.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.