COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CAAP vs LMT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CAAP scored 68.6, LMT scored 67.8 — CAAP leads.
Compare another set
CAAP
Corporación América Airports S.A.
68.6
$23.46 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.8
CAAP leads
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
67.8
$563.57 · $130.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCAAP13.3x
- Fastest growthLMT+7.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCAAP0.56
- Highest qualityLMT80 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCAAP-70%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CAAP
stronger →← stronger
LMT
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
91
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
LMT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CAAP
LMT
$468mC
FCF
$8.7bB+
+6.4%C+
Rev
+7.2%B
0.56B
D/E
2.34D
13.3xA-
P/E
20.8xB+
0.71A-
PEG
1.22B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CAAP
LMT
70% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
+170%
1-yr DCF upside
+3%
+230%
5-yr DCF upside
+9%
+347%
10-yr DCF upside
+18%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CAAP
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
LMT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
CAAPCorporación América Airports S.A.
Why now
Airports & Air Services · market cap $3.8b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $30.50 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $32.29 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
LMTLockheed Martin Corporation
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $130.1b. 19% off the 52-week high of $692.00. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $632.95 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 72% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 139% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $130.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
D/E 2.34 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CAAP and LMT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.8 points in favor of CAAP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCAAP 91.4 · LMT 57.7CAAP +33.7
- GrowthCAAP 50.0 · LMT 67.1LMT +17.1
- QualityCAAP 70.5 · LMT 80.4LMT +9.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.