COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CAAP vs KRMN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CAAP scored 68.6, KRMN scored 33.1 — CAAP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. KRMN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but CAAP's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CAAP
Corporación América Airports S.A.
68.6
$23.46 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
35.5
CAAP leads
KRMN
Karman Holdings Inc.
33.1
$53.40 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthKRMN+50.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCAAP0.56
- Highest qualityCAAP71 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCAAP-70%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CAAP
stronger →← stronger
KRMN
71
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
91
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
7
CAAP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CAAP
KRMN
$468mC
FCF
-$28mF
+6.4%C+
Rev
+50.2%A
0.56B
D/E
2.08D
13.3xA-
P/E
—
0.71A-
PEG
—
—
P/S
12.0xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CAAP
KRMN
70% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+170%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+230%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+347%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CAAP
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
KRMN
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CAAPCorporación América Airports S.A.
Why now
Airports & Air Services · market cap $3.8b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $30.50 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $32.29 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
KRMNKarman Holdings Inc.
Why now
Aerospace & Defense · market cap $7.1b. Down 55% from 52-week high of $118.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +50% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.10 (implying +63% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.08 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$28m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 197.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CAAP and KRMN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 35.5 points in favor of CAAP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCAAP 91.4 · KRMN 7.4CAAP +84.0
- GrowthCAAP 50.0 · KRMN 96.1KRMN +46.1
- QualityCAAP 70.5 · KRMN 51.0CAAP +19.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.