COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BZ vs YELP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BZ scored 67.3, YELP scored 74.2 — YELP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. YELP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BZ's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BZ
KANZHUN LIMITED
67.3
$15.95 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.9
YELP leads
YELP
Yelp Inc.
74.2
$23.46 · $1.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestYELP11.3x
- Fastest growthBZ+12.4%
- Strongest balance sheetBZ0.01
- Highest qualityYELP88 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueYELP-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BZ
stronger →← stronger
YELP
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
53
91
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
BZ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BZ
YELP
$688mC+
FCF
$297mC
+12.4%B+
Rev
+1.5%C
0.01A
D/E
0.19A-
14.9xB+
P/E
11.3xA-
0.20A
PEG
0.57A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BZ
YELP
42% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+54%
1-yr DCF upside
+248%
+72%
5-yr DCF upside
+254%
+102%
10-yr DCF upside
+262%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
YELP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BZKANZHUN LIMITED
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $7.1b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $25.26 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.20 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $20.83 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
YELPYelp Inc.
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.3b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $34.49 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.57 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $26.00 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BZ and YELP diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.9 points in favor of YELP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthBZ 87.5 · YELP 53.4BZ +34.1
- QualityBZ 69.8 · YELP 88.1YELP +18.3
- ValueBZ 90.7 · YELP 86.7BZ +4.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.