COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BZ vs OPRA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BZ scored 67.3, OPRA scored 73.1 — OPRA leads.
Compare another set
BZ
KANZHUN LIMITED
67.3
$15.95 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.8
OPRA leads
OPRA
Opera Limited
73.1
$18.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestOPRA13.7x
- Fastest growthOPRA+27.9%
- Strongest balance sheetBZ0.01
- Highest qualityBZ70 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBZ-42%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BZ
stronger →← stronger
OPRA
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
95
91
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
BZ and OPRA split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BZ
OPRA
$688mC+
FCF
$112mC
+12.4%B+
Rev
+27.9%A-
0.01A
D/E
0.01A
14.9xB+
P/E
13.7xB+
0.20A
PEG
0.54A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BZ
OPRA
42% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+54%
1-yr DCF upside
+18%
+72%
5-yr DCF upside
+54%
+102%
10-yr DCF upside
+128%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
OPRA
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
The companies
BZKANZHUN LIMITED
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $7.1b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $25.26 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.20 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $20.83 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 137% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
OPRAOpera Limited
Why now
Internet Content & Information · market cap $1.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $21.06. Revenue growing +28% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $26.29 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 104% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 87% of earnings on a 4.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BZ and OPRA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.8 points in favor of OPRA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBZ 90.7 · OPRA 59.0BZ +31.7
- GrowthBZ 87.5 · OPRA 95.4OPRA +7.9
- QualityBZ 69.8 · OPRA 69.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.