COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BYD vs YETI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BYD scored 41.7, YETI scored 67.8 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
41.7
$81.00 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.1
YETI leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.8
$43.08 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBYD3.6x
- Fastest growthYETI+6.2%
- Strongest balance sheetYETI0.42
- Highest qualityYETI89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BYD
stronger →← stronger
YETI
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
23
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
46
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
YETI is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BYD
YETI
$35mC-
FCF
$257mC
+1.7%C
Rev
+6.2%C+
1.30B
D/E
0.42A-
3.6xA
P/E
19.2xB
3.03D
PEG
1.27B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BYD
YETI
953% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
-91%
1-yr DCF upside
-15%
-91%
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
-89%
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BYD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Earnings outpace cash
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
BYDBoyd Gaming Corporation
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $5.9b. 11% off the 52-week high of $91.41. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $95.94 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 44% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 73% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BYD and YETI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.1 points in favor of YETI. The widest single difference is Growth, where YETI leads by 27.4 points.
- GrowthBYD 22.6 · YETI 50.0YETI +27.4
- ValueBYD 45.7 · YETI 69.6YETI +23.9
- QualityBYD 70.3 · YETI 89.4YETI +19.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.