Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BXP scored 69.0, HIW scored 59.0 — BXP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. BXP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HIW's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BXP
BXP, Inc.
REIT - Office · Financial strength
68.7Fin
$57.93 · $10.5B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
11.3
HIW leads
HIW
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
REIT - Office · Financial strength
80Fin
$29.76 · $3.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthBXP+2.2%
Strongest balance sheetHIW1.33
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BXP
HIW
4.7%B+
Yield
6.9%A-
+2.2%C
Rev
-2.4%D+
2.12C
D/E
1.33C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
BXPBXP, Inc.
REIT - Office · $57.93 · beta 1.05
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $10.5b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $74.96 — deep drawdown territory. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $75.95 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 2.12 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Dividend payout 151% of earnings on a 4.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
HIWHighwoods Properties, Inc.
REIT - Office · $29.76 · beta 1.08
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $3.3b. 16% off the 52-week high of $35.44. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $32.33 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close.
Risk
Dividend payout 132% of earnings on a 6.9% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is BXP or HIW the better stock?
BXP scores higher: BXP 69.0, HIW 59.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are BXP and HIW scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.