Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BX scored 78.0, HLNE scored 81.0 — HLNE leads.
Compare another set
BX
Blackstone Inc.
Asset Management · Financial strength
76.1Fin
$105.83 · $126.5B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
9.7
HLNE leads
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
Asset Management · Financial strength
85.8Fin
$82.92 · $5.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHLNE12.6x
Fastest growthBX+13.5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BX
HLNE
+13.5%B+
Rev
+6.5%C+
23.7xC
P/E
12.6xB
31.4%A
ROE
32.4%A
10.19D
P/B
3.96C
4.6%B+
Yield
2.8%B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
BXBlackstone Inc.
Asset Management · $105.83 · beta 1.59
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $126.5b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $166.39 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $141.64 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $126.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.59 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Dividend payout 111% of earnings on a 4.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
HLNEHamilton Lane Incorporated
Asset Management · $82.92 · beta 1.25
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $5.6b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $155.66 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.38 (implying +56% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is HLNE or BX the better stock?
HLNE scores higher: HLNE 81.0, BX 78.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are HLNE and BX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.