COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BURL vs TPR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BURL scored 62.2, TPR scored 65.7 — TPR leads.
Compare another set
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
62.2
$330.64 · $20.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.5
TPR leads
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
65.7
$132.16 · $26.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTPR17.9x
- Fastest growthTPR+14.2%
- Strongest balance sheetBURL3.20
- Highest qualityTPR82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BURL
stronger →← stronger
TPR
57
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
82
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
BURL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BURL
TPR
$383mC
FCF
$1.8bC+
+10.6%B
Rev
+14.2%B+
3.20C
D/E
5.72D
33.6xC
P/E
17.9xB+
0.92B+
PEG
1.86C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BURL
TPR
274% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% above
~48%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-77%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-73%
5-yr DCF upside
-11%
-66%
10-yr DCF upside
+2%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BURL
TPR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
BURLBurlington Stores, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $20.8b. 13% off the 52-week high of $378.33. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $386.00 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 3.20 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $26.4b. 20% off the 52-week high of $164.80. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.40 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 5.72 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BURL and TPR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.5 points in favor of TPR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityBURL 57.4 · TPR 81.9TPR +24.5
- ValueBURL 51.2 · TPR 42.7BURL +8.5
- GrowthBURL 81.9 · TPR 81.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.