COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BURL vs MNSO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BURL scored 62.2, MNSO scored 66.9 — MNSO leads.
Compare another set
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
62.2
$330.64 · $20.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.7
MNSO leads
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
66.9
$11.02 · $3.3B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestMNSO11.1x
- Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetMNSO1.04
- Highest qualityMNSO79 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BURL
stronger →← stronger
MNSO
57
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
79
82
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
MNSO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BURL
MNSO
$383mC
FCF
—
+10.6%B
Rev
+26.2%A-
3.20C
D/E
1.04B
33.6xC
P/E
11.1xA-
0.92B+
PEG
0.86B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BURL
MNSO
274% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~48%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-77%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-73%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-66%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BURL
MNSO
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (CNY)
The companies
BURLBurlington Stores, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $20.8b. 13% off the 52-week high of $378.33. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.92 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $386.00 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 3.20 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 34x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $3.3b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.08 (implying +73% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BURL and MNSO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.7 points in favor of MNSO. The widest single difference is Quality, where MNSO leads by 21.8 points.
- QualityBURL 57.4 · MNSO 79.2MNSO +21.8
- ValueBURL 51.2 · MNSO 71.5MNSO +20.3
- GrowthBURL 81.9 · MNSO 95.7MNSO +13.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.