COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
AMR vs BTU
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMR scored 21.3, BTU scored 13.0 — AMR leads.
Compare another set
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
21.3
$227.38 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.3
AMR leads
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
13
$29.44 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBTU0.9x
- Fastest growthBTU-0.7%
- Strongest balance sheetAMR0.01
- Highest qualityAMR37 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMR
stronger →← stronger
BTU
37
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
31
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
18
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
5
AMR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMR
BTU
-$1mF
FCF
-$192mF
-12.9%D
Rev
-0.7%D+
0.01A
D/E
0.13A
1.4xB+
P/S
0.9xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
AMR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
BTU
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
Why now
Coking Coal · market cap $2.9b. 10% off the 52-week high of $253.82. Revenue -13% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $180.00 (implying -21% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$1m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Revenue contracting -13% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Currently unprofitable (margin -2.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk.
BTUPeabody Energy Corporation
Why now
Thermal Coal · market cap $3.6b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $41.14 — deep drawdown territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $30.75 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$192m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -5.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMR and BTU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.3 points in favor of AMR. The widest single difference is Value, where AMR leads by 13.2 points.
- ValueAMR 18.3 · BTU 5.1AMR +13.2
- QualityAMR 37.2 · BTU 30.6AMR +6.6
- GrowthAMR 14.1 · BTU 14.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.