COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BTSG vs PRVA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BTSG scored 54.3, PRVA scored 56.3 — PRVA leads.
Compare another set
BTSG
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
54.3
$58.87 · $11.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.0
PRVA leads
PRVA
Privia Health Group, Inc.
56.3
$21.12 · $2.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBTSG52.6x
- Fastest growthBTSG+26.4%
- Strongest balance sheetPRVA0.01
- Highest qualityBTSG51 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePRVA-14%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BTSG
stronger →← stronger
PRVA
51
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
45
92
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
34
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
BTSG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BTSG
PRVA
$402mC
FCF
$131mC
+26.4%A-
Rev
+24.1%A-
1.16C
D/E
0.01A
52.6xC
P/E
96.0xD
2.11C
PEG
4.50D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BTSG
PRVA
112% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
14% below
~37%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
-64%
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
-53%
5-yr DCF upside
+16%
-33%
10-yr DCF upside
+63%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BTSG
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
PRVA
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
BTSGBrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
Why now
Health Information Services · market cap $11.6b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $73.75 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $78.94 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 52.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.88 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 2.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
PRVAPrivia Health Group, Inc.
Why now
Health Information Services · market cap $2.7b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $28.82 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +24%, comfortably above the S&P median. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.67 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 96.0x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 1.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BTSG and PRVA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.0 points in favor of PRVA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBTSG 34.4 · PRVA 44.0PRVA +9.6
- QualityBTSG 50.6 · PRVA 44.6BTSG +6.0
- GrowthBTSG 92.0 · PRVA 91.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.