COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BTG vs TFPM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BTG scored 70.4, TFPM scored 59.7 — BTG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. TFPM's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BTG's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BTG
B2Gold Corp
70.4
$5.52 · $7.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.7
BTG leads
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
59.7
$33.79 · $7.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBTG9.9x
- Fastest growthBTG+60.9%
- Strongest balance sheetTFPM0.10
- Highest qualityBTG76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBTG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BTG
stronger →← stronger
TFPM
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
92
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
BTG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BTG
TFPM
$923mC+
FCF
$215mC
+60.9%A
Rev
+44.5%A
0.11A-
D/E
0.10A-
9.9xA
P/E
16.9xB+
0.10A
PEG
1.54C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BTG
TFPM
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
85% above
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~23%/yr
+77%
1-yr DCF upside
-51%
+131%
5-yr DCF upside
-46%
+238%
10-yr DCF upside
-38%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BTG
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
TFPM
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cyclical growth
The companies
BTGB2Gold Corp
Why now
Gold · market cap $7.3b. 12% off the 52-week high of $6.29. Revenue growing +61% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.10 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $6.15 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
TFPMTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp.
Why now
Other Precious Metals & Mining · market cap $7.0b. 19% off the 52-week high of $41.70. Revenue growing +45% — in hypergrowth territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.25 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 84% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
P/S 14.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BTG and TFPM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.7 points in favor of BTG. The widest single difference is Value, where BTG leads by 30.9 points.
- ValueBTG 92.1 · TFPM 61.2BTG +30.9
- QualityBTG 75.6 · TFPM 69.7BTG +5.9
- GrowthBTG 50.0 · TFPM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.