COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BTG vs SSRM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BTG scored 70.4, SSRM scored 66.9 — BTG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SSRM's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BTG's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BTG
B2Gold Corp
70.4
$5.52 · $7.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.5
BTG leads
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
66.9
$37.77 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBTG9.9x
- Fastest growthSSRM+63.7%
- Strongest balance sheetSSRM0.00
- Highest qualityBTG76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueBTG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BTG
stronger →← stronger
SSRM
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
92
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
81
BTG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BTG
SSRM
$923mC+
FCF
$321mC
+60.9%A
Rev
+63.7%A
0.11A-
D/E
0.00A
9.9xA
P/E
14.2xA-
0.10A
PEG
0.02A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BTG
SSRM
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
18% above
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
+77%
1-yr DCF upside
-26%
+131%
5-yr DCF upside
-15%
+238%
10-yr DCF upside
+2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BTG
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
SSRM
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
BTGB2Gold Corp
Why now
Gold · market cap $7.3b. 12% off the 52-week high of $6.29. Revenue growing +61% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.10 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $6.15 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
SSRMSSR Mining Inc.
Why now
Gold · market cap $7.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $38.40 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +64% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.02 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $41.40 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BTG and SSRM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.5 points in favor of BTG. The widest single difference is Value, where BTG leads by 11.3 points.
- ValueBTG 92.1 · SSRM 80.8BTG +11.3
- QualityBTG 75.6 · SSRM 74.2level
- GrowthBTG 50.0 · SSRM 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.