COMPARE · Reviewed July 2, 2026

BTG vs OGC

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BTG scored 70.9, OGC scored 72 — OGC ahead by 1.0999999999999943.
BTG
B2Gold Corp.
Gold · Quality-Growth
70.9
$4.08
Score gap
1.0999999999999943
OGC leads
OGC
OceanaGold Corporation
Gold · Quality-Growth
72
$26.10
BTGB2Gold Corp.
Gold · $4.08 · beta 1.30
Why now
Gold · market cap $5.4b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $6.29 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +61% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.18 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $6.55 (implying +61% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
OGCOceanaGold Corporation
Gold · $26.10 · beta 1.47
Why now
Gold · market cap $5.8b. Down 40% from 52-week high of $43.33 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +46% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 34% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Down 40% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
BTGComponentOGC
C+70FCFC+70
A95RevA95
B+85D/EA95
A-90P/E or P/SA95
A95PEGA95
Supplemental signals · feed the score, not on the row card
A95FCF YieldA95
B+85ROEA95
88.5Base composite91.8
BTG
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
covered yield (2.1% at 21% payout)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 370%)+2
Total+8
OGC
compounder synergy (FCF yield ≥5% + ROE ≥15% + D/E <1)+4
GARP sweet spot (PEG <1, positive FCF)+1
DCF cross-check (avg upside 120%)+2
Total+7
BTG upsideHorizonOGC upside
+234%1Y+57%
+337%5Y+105%
+540%10Y+197%
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.