COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
BRSL vs YUMC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRSL scored 35.9, YUMC scored 75.3 — YUMC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. YUMC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BRSL's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BRSL
Brightstar Lottery PLC
35.9
$11.32 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
39.4
YUMC leads
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
75.3
$44.71 · $15.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthYUMC+8.8%
- Strongest balance sheetYUMC0.38
- Highest qualityYUMC84 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueYUMC-14%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BRSL
stronger →← stronger
YUMC
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
12
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
YUMC is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BRSL
YUMC
-$415mF
FCF
$940mC+
-0.0%D+
Rev
+8.8%B
2.19C
D/E
0.38A-
0.8xB+
P/S
—
0.31A
PEG
1.24B
—
P/E
16.4xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BRSL
YUMC
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
14% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+0%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+16%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+42%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BRSL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
YUMC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
BRSLBrightstar Lottery PLC
Why now
Gambling · market cap $2.1b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $18.57 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.61 (implying +47% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.19 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$415m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $15.3b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $58.39 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $62.05 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 96% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BRSL and YUMC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 39.4 points in favor of YUMC. The widest single difference is Growth, where YUMC leads by 63.5 points.
- GrowthBRSL 12.2 · YUMC 75.7YUMC +63.5
- QualityBRSL 57.7 · YUMC 84.0YUMC +26.3
- ValueBRSL 65.9 · YUMC 67.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.