COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026

BRSL vs MLCO

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRSL scored 35.9, MLCO scored 66.2 — MLCO leads.
Compare another set
BRSL
Brightstar Lottery PLC
Gambling · Quality-Growth
35.9
$11.32 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
30.3
MLCO leads
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
Resorts & Casinos · Quality-Growth
66.2
$5.17 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthMLCO+11.3%
  • Highest qualityMLCO64 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueMLCO-93%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD35.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY57.7GROWTH12.2VALUE65.9
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD66.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY64.0GROWTH50.0VALUE90.6
BRSLMLCOQuality57.764.0Growth12.250.0Value65.990.6
FCFBRSL-$415mMLCO$809m
RevBRSL-0.0%MLCO+11.3%
PEGBRSL0.31MLCO0.59
BRSL
stronger →← stronger
MLCO
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
12
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
91
MLCO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
BRSL
MLCO
-$415mF
FCF
$809mC+
-0.0%D+
Rev
+11.3%B
2.19C
D/E
0.8xB+
P/S
0.31A
PEG
0.59A-
P/E
8.8xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BRSL
MLCO
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
93% below
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
1-yr DCF upside
+982%
5-yr DCF upside
+1335%
10-yr DCF upside
+2107%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BRSL
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cut its dividend
MLCO
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cyclical growth
BRSLBrightstar Lottery PLC
Gambling · $11.32 · beta 0.98
Why now
Gambling · market cap $2.1b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $18.57 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.61 (implying +47% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.19 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$415m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
Resorts & Casinos · $5.17 · beta 0.59
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $2.0b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $10.15 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $7.35 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE -15% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where BRSL and MLCO diverge

On the headline score the gap is 30.3 points in favor of MLCO. The widest single difference is Growth, where MLCO leads by 37.8 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.