COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
BRC vs CXW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BRC scored 63.1, CXW scored 50.6 — BRC leads.
Compare another set
BRC
Brady Corporation
63.1
$98.54 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.5
BRC leads
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
50.6
$30.20 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BRC
stronger →← stronger
CXW
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
47
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
36
BRC is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BRC
CXW
$181mC
FCF
$26mC-
+11.1%B
Rev
+12.7%B+
0.07A
D/E
1.02C+
22.4xB+
P/E
24.2xB+
1.67C+
PEG
1.06B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BRC
CXW
10% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
227% above
~7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~45%/yr
-5%
1-yr DCF upside
-77%
+12%
5-yr DCF upside
-69%
+43%
10-yr DCF upside
-53%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BRC
Why this score
- Durable high returns
CXW
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BRCBrady Corporation
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $4.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $99.29 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
CXWCoreCivic, Inc.
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $3.0b. 8% off the 52-week high of $32.69. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $36.40 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.