COMPARE · Reviewed August 7, 2026

BR vs INOD

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BR scored 77.7, INOD scored 77.6 — BR leads.
Compare another set
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions,
Information Technology Services · Quality-Growth
77.7
$164.75 · $18.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.1
BR leads
INOD
Innodata Inc.
Information Technology Services · Quality-Growth
77.6
$65.48 · $2.1B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD78/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY81GROWTH77VALUE76
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD78/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY86GROWTH100VALUE54
BR
stronger →← stronger
INOD
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
77
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
INOD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
BR
INOD
$1.3bC+
FCF
$184mC
+8.5%B
Rev
+39.0%A
1.24C
D/E
0.03A-
17.2xA-
P/E
58.5xC+
1.08B+
PEG
0.87B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BR
INOD
22% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
50% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
+17%
1-yr DCF upside
+54%
+28%
5-yr DCF upside
+102%
+46%
10-yr DCF upside
+202%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BR
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
INOD
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
  • Diluting shareholders
BRBroadridge Financial Solutions,
Information Technology Services · $164.75 · beta 0.89
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $18.8b. Down 39% from 52-week high of $271.91 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $209.63 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 39% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
INODInnodata Inc.
Information Technology Services · $65.48 · beta 2.92
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $2.1b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $125.14 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +39% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.75 (implying +87% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 58.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.92 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.