COMPARE · Reviewed August 4, 2026
BR vs EPAM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BR scored 77.5, EPAM scored 82.1 — EPAM leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. BR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but EPAM's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
77.5
$168.41 · $19.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.6
EPAM leads
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
82.1
$112.06 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BR
stronger →← stronger
EPAM
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
78
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
91
EPAM is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BR
EPAM
$1.3bC+
FCF
$544mC+
+8.5%B
Rev
+14.2%B+
1.21C
D/E
0.08B+
18.0xA-
P/E
16.1xA-
1.08B+
PEG
0.54A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BR
EPAM
19% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% below
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~2%/yr
+13%
1-yr DCF upside
+11%
+24%
5-yr DCF upside
+19%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
+30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BR
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
EPAM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $19.5b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $271.91 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $206.50 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc.
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $5.9b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $222.53 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $133.94 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 141% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.