COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
BP vs VET
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BP scored 37.0, VET scored 65.3 — VET leads.
Compare another set
BP
BP p.l.c.
37
$42.34 · $109.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
28.3
VET leads
VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
65.3
$12.71 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthVET+14.1%
- Strongest balance sheetVET0.63
- Highest qualityVET65 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVET-92%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BP
stronger →← stronger
VET
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
100
VET is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BP
VET
$11.3bA-
FCF
$1.0bC+
-1.1%D+
Rev
+14.1%B+
0.95C+
D/E
0.63B
20.2xC+
P/E
—
0.04A
PEG
—
—
P/S
1.5xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BP
VET
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
92% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
+40%
1-yr DCF upside
+847%
+26%
5-yr DCF upside
+1145%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
+1760%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BP
No notable signals flagged.
VET
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
BPBP p.l.c.
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $109.0b. 12% off the 52-week high of $48.27. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $47.63 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. $109.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Dividend payout 95% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 0.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
VETVermilion Energy Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $1.9b. 14% off the 52-week high of $14.82. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -37.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -29% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BP and VET diverge
On the headline score the gap is 28.3 points in favor of VET. The widest single difference is Growth, where VET leads by 35.9 points.
- GrowthBP 14.1 · VET 50.0VET +35.9
- ValueBP 74.7 · VET 100.0VET +25.3
- QualityBP 48.0 · VET 64.8VET +16.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.