COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
BP vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BP scored 37.0, RRC scored 66.0 — RRC leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. RRC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BP's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BP
BP p.l.c.
37
$42.34 · $109.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
29.0
RRC leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
66
$41.73 · $9.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestRRC11.5x
- Fastest growthRRC+17.3%
- Strongest balance sheetRRC0.22
- Highest qualityRRC89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRRC-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BP
stronger →← stronger
RRC
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
RRC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BP
RRC
$11.3bA-
FCF
$1.4bC+
-1.1%D+
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.95C+
D/E
0.22A-
20.2xC+
P/E
11.5xB+
0.04A
PEG
1.05B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BP
RRC
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
43% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+40%
1-yr DCF upside
+92%
+26%
5-yr DCF upside
+76%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
+56%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BP
No notable signals flagged.
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
BPBP p.l.c.
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $109.0b. 12% off the 52-week high of $48.27. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $47.63 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. $109.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Dividend payout 95% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 0.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.8b. 14% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.64 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BP and RRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 29.0 points in favor of RRC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityBP 48.0 · RRC 88.8RRC +40.8
- GrowthBP 14.1 · RRC 50.0RRC +35.9
- ValueBP 74.7 · RRC 64.8BP +9.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.