Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BP scored 43.3, EQT scored 62.8 — EQT leads.
Compare another set
BP
BP p.l.c.
Oil & Gas Integrated · Quality-Growth
43.3
$46.25 · $119.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.5
EQT leads
EQT
EQT Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
62.8
$52.83 · $33.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestEQT12.3x
Fastest growthEQT+60.0%
Strongest balance sheetEQT0.20
Highest qualityEQT72 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueEQT-72%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BP
stronger →← stronger
EQT
53
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
35
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
EQT is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BP
EQT
$16.1bA-
FCF
$3.8bB
+0.1%C
Rev
+60.0%A
0.95C+
D/E
0.20A-
22.6xC+
P/E
12.3xB+
0.05A
PEG
1.55C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BP
EQT
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-15%/yr
+94%
1-yr DCF upside
+175%
+85%
5-yr DCF upside
+252%
+73%
10-yr DCF upside
+412%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BP
No notable signals flagged.
EQT
Why this score
Cyclical growth
The companies
BPBP p.l.c.
Oil & Gas Integrated · $46.25 · beta -0.20
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $119.1b. 4% off the 52-week high of $48.27. PEG 0.05 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.42 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income. $119.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Dividend payout 95% of earnings on a 4.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 2.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
EQTEQT Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $52.83 · beta 0.65
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $33.0b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $68.24 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +60% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $67.19 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 139% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BP and EQT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.5 points in favor of EQT. The widest single difference is Value, where EQT leads by 33.1 points.
ValueBP 35.3 · EQT 68.4EQT +33.1
QualityBP 53.4 · EQT 72.4EQT +19.0
GrowthBP 43.0 · EQT 50.0EQT +7.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is EQT or BP the better stock?
EQT scores higher: EQT 62.8, BP 43.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do EQT and BP differ most?
The widest gap is value, where EQT leads by 33 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. EQT leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are EQT and BP scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.