COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
BP vs CHRD
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BP scored 37.0, CHRD scored 63.0 — CHRD leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CHRD's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BP's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BP
BP p.l.c.
37
$42.34 · $109.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.0
CHRD leads
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
63
$145.99 · $8.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCHRD9.9x
- Fastest growthCHRD+19.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCHRD0.18
- Highest qualityCHRD73 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCHRD-45%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BP
stronger →← stronger
CHRD
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
69
CHRD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BP
CHRD
$11.3bA-
FCF
$1.2bC+
-1.1%D+
Rev
+19.2%B+
0.95C+
D/E
0.18A-
20.2xC+
P/E
9.9xA-
0.04A
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BP
CHRD
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-15%/yr
+40%
1-yr DCF upside
+102%
+26%
5-yr DCF upside
+82%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
+57%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BP
No notable signals flagged.
CHRD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
BPBP p.l.c.
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $109.0b. 12% off the 52-week high of $48.27. PEG 0.04 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $47.63 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. $109.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Dividend payout 95% of earnings on a 4.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 0.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $8.0b. 5% off the 52-week high of $153.00. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.47 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BP and CHRD diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.0 points in favor of CHRD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthBP 14.1 · CHRD 50.0CHRD +35.9
- QualityBP 48.0 · CHRD 72.6CHRD +24.6
- ValueBP 74.7 · CHRD 68.9BP +5.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.