Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BNL scored 72.0, EPR scored 71.0 — BNL leads.
Compare another set
BNL
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
REIT - Diversified · Financial strength
80.4Fin
$18.32 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
0.4
EPR leads
EPR
EPR Properties
REIT - Specialty · Financial strength
80.8Fin
$54.80 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthBNL+5.2%
Strongest balance sheetBNL0.89
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BNL
EPR
6.4%A-
Yield
6.8%A-
+5.2%C+
Rev
+5.0%C+
0.89B
D/E
1.52C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
BNLBroadstone Net Lease, Inc.
REIT - Diversified · $18.32 · beta 0.94
Why now
REIT - Diversified · market cap $3.9b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $23.10 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $23.60 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 31% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma.
Risk
Dividend payout 153% of earnings on a 6.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
EPREPR Properties
REIT - Specialty · $54.80 · beta 1.02
Why now
REIT - Specialty · market cap $4.2b. 16% off the 52-week high of $64.97. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $64.68 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 115% of earnings on a 6.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is BNL or EPR the better stock?
BNL scores higher: BNL 72.0, EPR 71.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are BNL and EPR scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.