Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BLDR scored 26.9, EME scored 72.5 — EME leads.
Compare another set
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
Building Products & Equipment · Quality-Growth
26.9
$52.85 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
45.6
EME leads
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
Engineering & Construction · Quality-Growth
72.5
$789.45 · $34.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestEME24.6x
Fastest growthEME+16.6%
Strongest balance sheetEME0.13
Highest qualityEME84 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueBLDR-1%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BLDR
stronger →← stronger
EME
53
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
12
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
30
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
EME is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BLDR
EME
$639mC+
FCF
$1.2bC+
-7.4%D
Rev
+16.6%B+
1.31C
D/E
0.13A-
57.4xD
P/E
24.6xB
—
PEG
0.32A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BLDR
EME
1% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
75% above
~-2%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~24%/yr
+13%
1-yr DCF upside
-50%
+1%
5-yr DCF upside
-43%
-13%
10-yr DCF upside
-31%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BLDR
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
EME
Why this score
Durable high returns
The companies
BLDRBuilders FirstSource, Inc.
Building Products & Equipment · $52.85 · beta 1.45
Why now
Building Products & Equipment · market cap $5.7b. Down 60% from 52-week high of $131.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -7% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $76.05 (implying +44% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income, mostly because of depreciation and amortization ($597m) — non-cash charges that hold down reported earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 57.4x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Revenue contracting -7% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 60% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.
Engineering & Construction · $789.45 · beta 1.12
Why now
Engineering & Construction · market cap $34.8b. 17% off the 52-week high of $951.96. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.32 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,033 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
ROE 40% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BLDR and EME diverge
On the headline score the gap is 45.6 points in favor of EME. The widest single difference is Growth, where EME leads by 75.7 points.
GrowthBLDR 12.4 · EME 88.1EME +75.7
QualityBLDR 52.9 · EME 83.8EME +30.9
ValueBLDR 29.7 · EME 51.5EME +21.8
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is EME or BLDR the better stock?
EME scores higher: EME 72.5, BLDR 26.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do EME and BLDR differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where EME leads by 76 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. EME leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are EME and BLDR scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.