COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BIRK vs PVH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BIRK scored 66.9, PVH scored 54.2 — BIRK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PVH's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but BIRK's are as of December 2025 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
66.9
$35.64 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.7
BIRK leads
PVH
PVH Corp.
54.2
$77.03 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestBIRK16.7x
- Fastest growthBIRK+14.7%
- Strongest balance sheetBIRK0.69
- Highest qualityBIRK63 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePVH-33%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BIRK
stronger →← stronger
PVH
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
52
89
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
41
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
BIRK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BIRK
PVH
$362mC
FCF
$551mC+
+14.7%B+
Rev
+3.5%C+
0.69B+
D/E
0.86B
16.7xB+
P/E
23.8xC+
1.03B+
PEG
0.06A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BIRK
PVH
11% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
33% below
~11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-12%
1-yr DCF upside
+46%
+12%
5-yr DCF upside
+48%
+59%
10-yr DCF upside
+52%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BIRK
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
PVH
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $5.9b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $53.53 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.54 (implying +53% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
PVHPVH Corp.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $3.6b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $100.75 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.06 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $91.83 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Beta 1.75 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 1.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BIRK and PVH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.7 points in favor of BIRK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthBIRK 89.3 · PVH 41.0BIRK +48.3
- ValueBIRK 62.4 · PVH 74.8PVH +12.4
- QualityBIRK 62.8 · PVH 52.1BIRK +10.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.