Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BIRK scored 68.5, FIGS scored 66.4 — BIRK leads.
Compare another set
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
Footwear & Accessories · Quality-Growth
68.5
$33.65 · $5.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.1
BIRK leads
FIGS
FIGS, Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · Quality-Growth
66.4
$15.78 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestBIRK15.8x
Fastest growthBIRK+16.2%
Strongest balance sheetFIGS0.13
Highest qualityFIGS70 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BIRK
stronger →← stronger
FIGS
60
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
88
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
FIGS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BIRK
FIGS
$327mC
FCF
$97mC-
+16.2%B+
Rev
+13.6%B+
0.69B+
D/E
0.13A
15.8xB+
P/E
47.8xD
0.95B+
PEG
8.57D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BIRK
FIGS
2% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% above
~13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
-19%
1-yr DCF upside
-43%
-2%
5-yr DCF upside
-35%
+27%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BIRK
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
Foreign reporter (EUR)
FIGS
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc
Footwear & Accessories · $33.65 · beta 1.30
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $5.6b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $50.73 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $50.16 (implying +49% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
FIGSFIGS, Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · $15.78 · beta 1.07
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $2.6b. 10% off the 52-week high of $17.48. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.63 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BIRK and FIGS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.1 points in favor of BIRK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueBIRK 72.3 · FIGS 47.2BIRK +25.1
QualityBIRK 59.9 · FIGS 70.0FIGS +10.1
GrowthBIRK 86.6 · FIGS 88.4level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is BIRK or FIGS the better stock?
BIRK scores higher: BIRK 68.5, FIGS 66.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do BIRK and FIGS differ most?
The widest gap is value, where BIRK leads by 25 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are BIRK and FIGS scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.