COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
BIRK vs DECK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BIRK scored 66.2, DECK scored 79.7 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DECK's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BIRK's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
66.2
$38.88 · $7.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.5
DECK leads
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
79.7
$99.50 · $13.6B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BIRK
stronger →← stronger
DECK
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
96
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
DECK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BIRK
DECK
$356mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+14.7%B+
Rev
+7.9%B
0.48B+
D/E
0.21A-
17.7xB+
P/E
14.2xA-
1.11B+
PEG
1.19B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BIRK
DECK
13% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
22% below
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
-30%
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
+28%
+22%
10-yr DCF upside
+47%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BIRK
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $7.2b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $53.53 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $52.27 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $13.6b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.