COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

BGC vs VIRT

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BGC scored 72.0, VIRT scored 80.0 — VIRT leads.
Compare another set
BGC
BGC Group, Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
48.3Fin
$11.48 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
19.5
VIRT leads
VIRT
Virtu Financial, Inc.
Capital Markets · Financial strength
67.8Fin
$57.51 · $5.1B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestVIRT9.6x
  • Fastest growthBGC+30.9%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD48.3/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL48.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.8/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL67.8
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)16%41%4.6x34xBGCVIRT

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevBGC+30.9%VIRT+26.2%
P/EBGC28.7xVIRT9.6x
ROEBGC15.9%VIRT53.6%
P/BBGC4.91VIRT2.72
YieldBGC0.7%VIRT1.7%
BGC
VIRT
+30.9%A
Rev
+26.2%A-
28.7xD
P/E
9.6xA-
15.9%B+
ROE
53.6%A
4.91D
P/B
2.72C+
0.7%C
Yield
1.7%C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BGCBGC Group, Inc.
Capital Markets · $11.48 · beta 0.99
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $5.4b. 11% off the 52-week high of $12.89. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory.
Moat
ROE 16% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Credit-cycle exposure — provisions tend to lag actual loan deterioration by 2-3 quarters; a sharp uptick in net charge-offs is a leading indicator the market often misses until it's already priced.
VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc.
Capital Markets · $57.51 · beta 0.65
Why now
Capital Markets · market cap $5.1b. 16% off the 52-week high of $68.76. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $69.43 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 54% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
D/E 4.15 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is VIRT or BGC the better stock?

VIRT scores higher: VIRT 80.0, BGC 72.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are VIRT and BGC scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.