COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BG vs HSY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BG scored 40.5, HSY scored 66.2 — HSY leads.
Compare another set
BG
Bunge Global SA
40.5
$110.16 · $21.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
25.7
HSY leads
HSY
The Hershey Company
66.2
$189.94 · $38.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthBG+17.5%
- Strongest balance sheetBG0.98
- Highest qualityHSY82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueHSY-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BG
stronger →← stronger
HSY
33
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
29
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
HSY is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BG
HSY
-$1.2bF
FCF
$2.2bB
+17.5%B+
Rev
+7.7%B
0.98B
D/E
1.30C+
1.2xB+
P/S
—
1.37B
PEG
1.06B+
—
P/E
25.9xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BG
HSY
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-3%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+15%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+46%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BG
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
HSY
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
BGBunge Global SA
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $21.2b. 18% off the 52-week high of $134.87. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $141.22 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$1.2b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
HSYThe Hershey Company
Why now
Confectioners · market cap $38.2b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $239.48 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $205.52 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 150% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BG and HSY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 25.7 points in favor of HSY. The widest single difference is Quality, where HSY leads by 48.4 points.
- QualityBG 33.3 · HSY 81.7HSY +48.4
- ValueBG 28.6 · HSY 46.9HSY +18.3
- GrowthBG 69.9 · HSY 75.9HSY +6.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.