COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
BG vs CCU
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BG scored 40.5, CCU scored 58.7 — CCU leads.
Compare another set
BG
Bunge Global SA
40.5
$110.16 · $21.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.2
CCU leads
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
58.7
$12.66 · $2.3B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthBG+17.5%
- Strongest balance sheetCCU0.82
- Highest qualityCCU66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCU-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BG
stronger →← stronger
CCU
33
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
84
29
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
CCU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BG
CCU
-$1.2bF
FCF
$150mC
+17.5%B+
Rev
+13.2%B+
0.98B
D/E
0.82B
1.2xB+
P/S
—
1.37B
PEG
1.73C+
—
P/E
20.4xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BG
CCU
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
23% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+7%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+30%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BG
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (CLP)
The companies
BGBunge Global SA
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $21.2b. 18% off the 52-week high of $134.87. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $141.22 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$1.2b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Net margin 3.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $15.36. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $11.64 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BG and CCU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.2 points in favor of CCU. The widest single difference is Quality, where CCU leads by 32.3 points.
- QualityBG 33.3 · CCU 65.6CCU +32.3
- ValueBG 28.6 · CCU 50.3CCU +21.7
- GrowthBG 69.9 · CCU 84.2CCU +14.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.