COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
BEKE vs JLL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BEKE scored 76.0, JLL scored 82.0 — JLL leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. JLL's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BEKE's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BEKE
KE Holdings Inc.
55.4Fin
$18.32 · $20.2B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
6.4
BEKE leads
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
49Fin
$378.01 · $17.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthJLL+11.4%
- Strongest balance sheetBEKE0.22
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BEKE
JLL
1.6%C+
Yield
0.0%C
+1.2%C
Rev
+11.4%B
0.22A
D/E
0.42A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
BEKEKE Holdings Inc.
Why now
Real Estate Services · market cap $20.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $20.98. PEG 0.52 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $23.61 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
JLLJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Why now
Real Estate Services · market cap $17.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $393.84. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $421.40 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Net margin 3.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.