COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

BCO vs GEO

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCO scored 68.1, GEO scored 45.0 — BCO leads.
Compare another set
BCO
Brinks Company (The)
Security & Protection Services · Quality-Growth
68.1
$111.43 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
23.1
BCO leads
GEO
Geo Group Inc (The) REIT
Security & Protection Services · Quality-Growth
45
$32.71 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestGEO15.4x
  • Fastest growthGEO+15.3%
  • Highest qualityBCO67 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueBCO-17%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD68.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY66.6GROWTH63.4VALUE74.9
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD45.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.4GROWTH46.0VALUE31.8
BCOGEOQuality66.662.4Growth63.446.0Value74.931.8
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%25%10x31xBCOGEO

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFBCO$313mGEO$26m
RevBCO+8.1%GEO+15.3%
P/EBCO25.8xGEO15.4x
PEGBCO1.16GEO1.82
BCO
stronger →← stronger
GEO
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
63
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
46
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
BCO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
BCO
GEO
$313mC
FCF
$26mC-
+8.1%B
Rev
+15.3%B+
D/E
1.06C+
25.8xB
P/E
15.4xA-
1.16B+
PEG
1.82C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BCO
GEO
17% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
471% above
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
+6%
1-yr DCF upside
-87%
+20%
5-yr DCF upside
-82%
+43%
10-yr DCF upside
-73%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BCO
No notable signals flagged.
GEO
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
BCOBrinks Company (The)
Security & Protection Services · $111.43 · beta 1.04
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $4.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $136.37.
Moat
ROE 58% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 173% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 3.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GEOGeo Group Inc (The) REIT
Security & Protection Services · $32.71 · beta 0.78
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $32.91 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $37.75 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where BCO and GEO diverge

On the headline score the gap is 23.1 points in favor of BCO. The widest single difference is Value, where BCO leads by 43.1 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.