COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADT vs BCO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADT scored 59.3, BCO scored 68.1 — BCO leads.
Compare another set
ADT
ADT Inc.
59.3
$7.38 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.8
BCO leads
BCO
Brinks Company (The)
68.1
$111.43 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADT10.3x
- Fastest growthBCO+8.1%
- Highest qualityADT69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueADT-82%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADT
stronger →← stronger
BCO
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
52
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
63
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
BCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADT
BCO
$2.0bC+
FCF
$313mC
+2.1%C
Rev
+8.1%B
2.24D
D/E
—
10.3xA
P/E
25.8xB
1.50B
PEG
1.16B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADT
BCO
82% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
17% below
decline
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
+440%
1-yr DCF upside
+6%
+467%
5-yr DCF upside
+20%
+508%
10-yr DCF upside
+43%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADT
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
BCO
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ADTADT Inc.
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $5.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $8.94. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $8.23 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.24 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
BCOBrinks Company (The)
Why now
Security & Protection Services · market cap $4.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $136.37.
Moat
ROE 58% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 173% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 3.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADT and BCO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.8 points in favor of BCO. The widest single difference is Value, where BCO leads by 16.4 points.
- ValueADT 58.5 · BCO 74.9BCO +16.4
- GrowthADT 51.8 · BCO 63.4BCO +11.6
- QualityADT 68.7 · BCO 66.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.