COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BCH vs PFSI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCH scored 64.0, PFSI scored 84.0 — PFSI leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PFSI's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BCH's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BCH
Banco de Chile
84.8Fin
$42.20 · $21.3B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
22.3
BCH leads
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
62.5Fin
$75.09 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPFSI10.3x
- Fastest growthPFSI+55.3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCH
PFSI
-1.6%D+
Rev
+55.3%A
16.3xC+
P/E
10.3xA-
21.6%A-
ROE
—
0.73A
P/B
—
5.2%A-
Yield
—
—
PEG
0.19A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
BCHBanco de Chile
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $21.3b. 10% off the 52-week high of $46.77. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $39.52 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 45% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Dividend payout 85% of earnings on a 5.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
Why now
Mortgage Finance · market cap $3.9b. Down 53% from 52-week high of $160.36 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +55% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.19 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $90.57 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Down 53% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.