COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
BCC vs WFG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCC scored 34.8, WFG scored 15.9 — BCC leads.
Compare another set
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
34.8
$74.98 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.9
BCC leads
WFG
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
15.9
$62.64 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BCC
stronger →← stronger
WFG
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
33
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
24
18
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
5
BCC is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCC
WFG
$39mC-
FCF
-$315mF
-3.8%D+
Rev
-11.5%D
0.27B+
D/E
0.10A-
25.2xC+
P/E
—
2.94C
PEG
—
—
P/S
0.9xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BCC
WFG
203% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~45%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-75%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-67%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BCC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
WFG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BCCBoise Cascade Company
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $2.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $91.97. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.33 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Net margin 1.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
WFGWest Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $4.9b. 19% off the 52-week high of $76.99. Revenue -12% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $85.17 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$315m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Revenue contracting -12% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Currently unprofitable (margin -17.2%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.