COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
BCC vs UFPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCC scored 34.8, UFPI scored 44.5 — UFPI leads.
Compare another set
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
34.8
$74.98 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.7
UFPI leads
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
44.5
$86.36 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BCC
stronger →← stronger
UFPI
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
46
18
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
30
UFPI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCC
UFPI
$39mC-
FCF
$301mC
-3.8%D+
Rev
-6.4%D
0.27B+
D/E
0.12A-
25.2xC+
P/E
18.8xB
2.94C
PEG
2.67C
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BCC
UFPI
203% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% below
~45%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
-75%
1-yr DCF upside
-12%
-67%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
+39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BCC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
UFPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BCCBoise Cascade Company
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $2.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $91.97. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.33 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Net margin 1.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $4.9b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $118.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -6% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $103.00 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 113% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -6% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 4.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.