COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
BCC vs SUZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCC scored 34.8, SUZ scored 51.9 — SUZ leads.
Compare another set
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
34.8
$74.98 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
17.1
SUZ leads
SUZ
Suzano S.A.
51.9
$8.39 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BCC
stronger →← stronger
SUZ
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
42
18
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
SUZ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCC
SUZ
$39mC-
FCF
$962mC+
-3.8%D+
Rev
+5.7%C+
0.27B+
D/E
2.02D
25.2xC+
P/E
4.7xA
2.94C
PEG
0.80A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BCC
SUZ
203% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
31% below
~45%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-4%/yr
-75%
1-yr DCF upside
+40%
-67%
5-yr DCF upside
+45%
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
+53%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BCC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
SUZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
BCCBoise Cascade Company
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $2.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $91.97. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.33 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Net margin 1.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SUZSuzano S.A.
Why now
Paper & Paper Products · market cap $10.4b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $11.54 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.80 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $12.57 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 2.02 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.