COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
BCC vs SLVM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCC scored 34.8, SLVM scored 41.8 — SLVM leads.
Compare another set
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
34.8
$74.98 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.0
SLVM leads
SLVM
Sylvamo Corporation
41.8
$37.32 · $1.5B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BCC
stronger →← stronger
SLVM
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
53
48
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
29
18
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
47
SLVM is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCC
SLVM
$39mC-
FCF
$10mC-
-3.8%D+
Rev
-11.0%D
0.27B+
D/E
1.01C
25.2xC+
P/E
14.9xB+
2.94C
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BCC
SLVM
203% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
412% above
~45%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~59%/yr
-75%
1-yr DCF upside
-85%
-67%
5-yr DCF upside
-80%
-51%
10-yr DCF upside
-70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BCC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
SLVM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
BCCBoise Cascade Company
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $2.6b. 18% off the 52-week high of $91.97. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.33 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Net margin 1.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SLVMSylvamo Corporation
Why now
Paper & Paper Products · market cap $1.5b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $56.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -11% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.75 (implying +39% upside).
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Revenue contracting -11% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 90% of earnings on a 4.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.